Should college athletes be paid? Speaking on "First Take," Tebow, 32, said. The vast majority of college basketball players never make it to the prosunder 100 out of about 5,000 athletesand an all-expenses paid degree provides a much better incentive than a paycheck . People who think college student-athletes should be paid often say the students' names and images are used on products and in advertising, among other things, so they should receive some of the profits. Now, the N.C.A.A. Los Angeles Lakers point guard Lonzo Ball recently said in an interview that college athletes should be paid. 1 Hunter Kylie Hunter Professor Olivia Lee English 1020 26 February 2021 Why College Athletes Should be Paid The debate whether college athletes should be paid or not has been around for a long time. People should realize that, and they should realize that amateurism never has been a sustainable model for a sports-entertainment industry. However, the National Collegiate Athletic Association refuses to allow student-athletes to be paid. Sports is one of the most popular industries in the entire world, and it is . Some argue student-athletes are "paid" through full scholarships, something most college students can only dream about and that's partially true. One of the biggest debates in the college sports world is whether or not student athletes should be paid. A more in-depth analysis, however, shows that paying college athletes would disrupt the nature of college athletics. College athletes bring in a great amount of money for their schools. Rebecca Lobo If you offer athletes stipends, then you're into pay-for-play, and that's the ballgame. Later that afternoon, he. And in exchange for all that . The goal of attending a college program should be to earn a degree. I think there's a symbiotic relationship there. Given the historical record, which shows that the NCAA well knew that it had established a pay-for-play system with the . The salaries that would be paid to the players is instead paid to the coach. "Should College Athletes Get Paid?" National Review Online. A 2019 Seton Hall Sports Poll found that 60% of those surveyed agreed that college athletes should be allowed compensation for their name, image, and/or likeness, while 32% disagreed, and 8% were unsure. Paying college athletes would create a whole new playing field, and the consequences would be costly (March Madness free, not pun-free.) On why NCAA athletes should receive some sort of monetary compensation: I always say the question of whether they should get paid is the wrong one. Students are not professional athletes who are paid salaries and incentives for a career in sports. In a 1,300-word essay published in Jacobin magazine, Abdul-Jabbar spoke . Tebow, an ESPN college football analyst and the 2007 Heisman Trophy winner, argued Friday that athletes' pursuit of compensation diminished college sports. There should be a contract like in civilized sports practices. A common misunderstanding surrounding college athletics is that athletes are already being paid. Everybody knows everybody's getting paid," Ball said. Most of them are just as talented, if not more talented, than the vast majority of college athletes. College athletes shouldn't be paid. That's why their stadium is smaller.) Those who say college student-athletes should not be paid argue that they receive scholarships as a form of payment for their talents. According to NCAA rules, "You are not eligible for participation in a sport if you have ever: Taken pay, or the promise of pay, for competing in that sport" (NCAA Regulations 1). Quotes from former players, officials. Last year, all the athletes in Division 1 schools generated 9.15 billion dollars in revenue. Coaches and athletic directors "earn" their exurbanite salaries each season, but players can only "earn" college tuition, and room and board. The typical Division I college football player devotes 43.3 hours per week to his . How will college athletes get paid? Athletes play at the college level and they further use that experience at the professional level where they will be paid. True: If paid, whether by salary or stipend, the athletes would become university employees. Like it or not, the money that athletes get goes a long way towards the development of their families and themselves. Reasons Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid. There is an argument that college athletes should not be paid because participating in college sports provides them with the invaluable publicity they can earn from upon turning professional. It wasn't in tennis. Agree: 49%. So many differences that people don't realize. A student who attempts to do this will end up leading a stressful life, which is not good for his or her health. has approved a historic change to allow student-athletes to be compensated for use of their N.I.L., with schools and conferences allowed to adopt their own additional policies . Questions about the details are plentiful, and answers are scarce. Reasons why student athletes should be paid. Furthermore, 53 percent of the public and 62 percent of sports fans are less than . We're talking $11 billion for three weekends of . So it should come as little surprise Tebow has taken a hard stance against a California bill passed by the state's government this week that would allow college athletes to more easily make money . Finally, the NCAA will likely attempt to revisit the Ninth Circuit's decision in O'Bannon, which held that payments to athletes should be "tethered to education.". Due to this law, not only are college athletes having difficulty in paying off their college tuition, but also many athletes are being paid under the table through . Votes: 1 Robert Griffin III The logistics governing any sort of pay structure for college athletes is unavoidably complicated. Former NFL player Tim Tebow reacts to the biggest sports news of the day on 'Fox & Friends.' I think the question is, "If the NCAA weren . "A top NBA coach gets $7 million-$8 million per year, and a top player makes four times that. That's what the NCAA provides. makes an annual profit of $750 million each year just off of television contracts (Vecsey). Works Cited Byers, Walter. In 2015 a study was performed of the two hundred thirty one NCAA Division 1 schools. The answer is simple: these athletes don't focus on the monetary aspect. They see athletics as an extracurricular activity for the students, and that athletics may not mean much to the school. Persuasive Essay: Why Should college Athletes be Paid. Athletes who take to the classroom naturally or are encouraged to focus on grades should be able to do well in the classroom. 5. These differences in public response to payment of participants in college football highlight the innate hypocrisy of NCAA college athletic policies. Votes: 1 In 2017 (the most recent year for which figures . "I'm not saying we should be paying athletes $5,000 or even $10,000 per semester. In "Teachers Unions and Student Performance: Help or Hindrance?", journalist Randall W. Eberts stated "America's need to provide high-quality education to its children has never been greater." This quote suggests the importance of teachers in our society, rendering the fact they should be paid more than professional athletes. (I know, I knowit's the Lions. An important argument coming from those who oppose paying college athletes is the expected difficulty involved with implementing such a move. California wants its college athletes to get paid, but the NCAA is likely to put up hurdles. According to a survey conducted by College Pulse in 2019, over 50% of college students polled support compensating college athletes. An overwhelming 80% of all students and 83% of athletes agreed that college athletes should be paid if their image is used for purposes such as selling merchandise. This provided the support for providing college athletes with an approximately $2,500 to $5,000 "cost-of-attendance" (COA) stipend, a move the NCAA fought. I believe the reason you go to college is to get your degree. Con #2: Paying college athletes would be a logistical quagmire. a profit of over millions of dollars off athletes in different ways (Blum). Since 2003, the college sports industry's profits have skyrocketed, jumping from $4 billion in 2003 to over . While it may seem like individual athletes rake in a lot of money for their schools and receive . It would culminate into a situation where the only motive the athletes have for playing is money and not the sportsman drive of winning games and trophies. The NCAA is telling Wilken that paying players would have "staggering and destructive implications" for college sports and for the educations of campus athletes. And it's not in big-time college sports. Paying college athletes would be unnecessary, unfair, and unfeasible. That $11 billion deal -- OK, it's $10.8 billion to be exact -- between the NCAA and CBS/Turner Sports for March Madness between 2011 and 2024. Qualified college athletes receive up to $5,645 put in their bank accounts a year. If college athletes were to start being paid, many schools would leave Division I sports, NCAA President Mark Emmert said Thursday. Everybody's getting paid anyway, you might as well make it legal. It's not just about playing football and getting paid to do it. So it is pretty much up to them to be smart with it and not blow it on something stupid. 6 February 2012. College athletes should be making money in some way related to the sports that they play. Why College Athletes Should be Paid I'm not saying we should be paying athletes $5,000 or even $10,000 per semester. As noted by . College Athletes Are Now Closer To Getting Paid After NCAA Board OKs Plan. And Yang's pitch . In addition to cost of attendance, the Oakland, California, judge ruled that colleges should be allowed to put aside up to $5,000 a year in a trust fund to compensate an athlete for use of his . "I don't think athletes are being exploited. Institutions of higher learning in the United States spend millions of dollars to recruit and train college athletes. Firefighters can abide in the fire station for up . Davis, Seth. has approved a historic change to allow student-athletes to be compensated for use of their N.I.L., with schools and conferences allowed to adopt their own additional policies . If each athlete got $2,000 paid over the course of the semester, this would give them some spending cash and an opportunity to start managing their money."-Tyson Hartnett in "Why College Athletes Should Be Paid." Web. 14 Apr. Paying student-athletes might sound like a fairer way to treat students who generate so much money and attention for their colleges (not to mention the television networks that broadcast their . Response: Strongly agree. These college athletes participate in various events at the expense of their time as students. "Only hesitation in complete agreement is that there is . Some experts believe this is because the organization wants to continue to control the exploitation of athletes for their own benefit. The University of Texas had the highest value $671,000, at OSU that value was $462,000 and the NCAA . The difficulty to implement is no excuse. Another reason why college athletes should be paid is that a student can not manage to study, participate in sports activities, and also work part-time. That's why Jim Harbaugh can quit the NFL, go to the University of Michigan, and still get the same compensation he made in the . Academics should be the top priority. 11/13/14 7:36AM. Once broken down the argument for why collegiate athletes should not get paid is pretty clear. Firefighters are the next contributor to society. They can have families accompany them on recruiting trips. They can get better health care while they're in school and afterward. It doesn't make much sense for them to not see monetary gain from what they are potentially going to be doing for a living. 14 Picture Quotes 1 Written Quote There's far more that goes into being a professional athlete than being a college athlete. Austan Goolsbee, Chicago Booth. Instead, they focus on more important things. The limits to what an athlete could receive for participation in college sports were appropriate in 1906 and arguably through 1984, when the U.S. Supreme Court decided NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, 4 but those limits raise issues today for many institutions. A high percentage of student-athletes graduate without . And the universities that stayed in . And someday, when Ed O'Bannon or someone like him beats the NCAA in court and players start getting paid like they should, we will look back on the days when college athletes weren't paid while . People think that athletes are students first and athletes' seconds. There was a grand total of 9.15 billion in sales during the 2015 year. Early on in the day, he admonished college athletic departments for relying on direct institutional support and state government subsidies in order to operate in the black. Scholarships are payment enough. National Review, 5 April 2011. It wasn't in the Olympics. That's how I feel. The final reason why college athletes should be paid is because the N.C.A.A. They learn valuable lessons about life, such as being humble in winning and being gracious in losing. It's not a minor league or an audition for the pros. Minor-league arenas attract even fewer spectators. If in return for their hard work, college athletes get nothing more than a scholarship and health protection . The reason college coaches are overpaid is because the salaries of their employees the players aren't determined by market forces. Colleges prepare athletes to go pro in . There is a split debate between whether college athletes should be paid or if they are getting paid through their scholarships, in David J. Berri's article "Paying NCAA Athletes" he says that " So it seems clear that college athletes are frequently exploited by the NCAA.